Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2020 85 • VG SZ II 2020 85 Généré par l'IA

Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets

Numéro de cause II 2020 85
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A claimant appealed a decision regarding supplementary benefits, specifically concerning the waiver of assets, debts, and property income, after the initial authority determined that the claimant's assets, including an apartment occupied by the claimant and their spouse, were not fully exhausted or deemed inconsequential for benefit eligibility. The court upheld the decision, reasoning that the retained asset value, derived from an apartment whose value was not sufficiently offset by the stated debts, meant the claimant's assets still exceeded the threshold for receiving supplementary benefits, thereby affirming the denial of the benefit claim.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets: The court upheld the decision, reasoning that the retained asset value, derived from an apartment whose value was not sufficiently offset by the stated debts, meant the claimant's assets still exceeded the threshold for receiving supplementary benefits, thereby affirming the denial of the benefit claim.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestations complémentaires revenu de la fortune renonciation à un revenu condition du droit à la prestation d'assurance bien-fonds occupé restitution de prestations
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 85 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 15. Dezember 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht / Schulden / \n Liegenschaftseinnahmen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: