Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2020 69 • VG SZ II 2020 69 Généré par l'IA

Supplementary Benefit Asset Valuation Appeal

Numéro de cause II 2020 69
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A claimant appealed a decision regarding supplementary benefits, specifically concerning the crediting of a loan or waiver of assets against their entitlement. The court reasoned that a loan provided to the claimant by a third party, which was structured as a repayment obligation, qualified as an asset for the purpose of calculating supplementary benefits, thereby justifying the reduction or denial of the benefits, as the claimant possessed a realizable asset despite the arrangement.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BV; Supplementary Benefit Asset Valuation Appeal: The court reasoned that a loan provided to the claimant by a third party, which was structured as a repayment obligation, qualified as an asset for the purpose of calculating supplementary benefits, thereby justifying the reduction or denial of the benefits, as the claimant possessed a realizable asset despite the arrangement.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
droit aux prestations complémentaires réduction de prestations estimation des actifs remboursement du prêt qualité pour recourir procédure de rappel d'impôt Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) | Ergänzungsleistungen

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BV
The final order mandates the appellant to pay court costs.
Généré par l'IA
II 2018 43
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
II 2018 35
Claimant v. Supplementary Benefits Decision on Asset Waiver
II 2024 107
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefit Denial Due to Asset Valuation of Partially Rented Property
II 2020 85
Claimant v. Authority Regarding Supplementary Benefits Eligibility Based on Unexhausted Assets
II 2020 42
Supplementary Benefits Asset Waiver Validity Appeal

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BV

The final order mandates the appellant to pay court costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 69 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. November 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Anrechnung eines Darlehens/ Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: