Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2020 59 • VG SZ II 2020 59 Généré par l'IA

Claimant v. Administrative Body (COVID-19 Loss of Earnings Appeal)

Numéro de cause II 2020 59
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A claimant sought compensation under the loss of earnings ordinance related to COVID-19, but the initial administrative ruling denied the benefit, leading to an appeal. The court reasoned that the relevant law concerning occupational disability benefits during the pandemic required the applicant to have been demonstrably incapable of working due to the specific health risks or protective measures associated with the virus, and since the claimant failed to establish such a documented incapacity to work during the claim period, the administrative decision denying the compensation was upheld.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 108 Abs. 1 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Claimant v. Administrative Body (COVID-19 Loss of Earnings Appeal): The court reasoned that the relevant law concerning occupational disability benefits during the pandemic required the applicant to have been demonstrably incapable of working due to the specific health risks or protective measures associated with the virus, and since the claimant failed to establish such a documented incapacity to work during the claim period, the administrative decision denying the compensation was upheld.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
indemnité pour perte de gain prestations d'invalidité professionnelle allégations de santé santé au travail profits et risques indemnité journalière en cas de maladie Erwerbsersatzordnung (Covid-19 Erwerbsausfall) | Erwerbsersatzordnung

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 108 Abs. 1 BGG
The appeal is rejected because the appeal against the decision of the Cantonal Court is dismissed.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
Costs are imposed on the appellant because the appeal was rejected.
Généré par l'IA
II 2021 70
Appeal Regarding Loss of Earnings Compensation Denial under Covid-19 Ordinance
II 2022 3
COVID-19 Loss of Earnings Compensation Appeal Ruling
II 2023 62
Claimant v. Compensation Office: Causality in COVID-19 Loss of Earnings Claims
II 2020 77
Occupational Benefit Scheme COVID-19 Loss of Earnings Appeal
II 2022 41
Claimant v. Compensation Fund: Denial of COVID-19 Earnings Replacement Benefits

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 108 Abs. 1 BGG

The appeal is rejected because the appeal against the decision of the Cantonal Court is dismissed.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Costs are imposed on the appellant because the appeal was rejected.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 59 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. August 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Erwerbsersatzordnung (Covid-19 Erwerbsausfall) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: