Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2020 51 • VG SZ II 2020 51 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Regarding Unemployment Benefits and Validity of Dismissal

Numéro de cause II 2020 51
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case involved an appeal against a decision by the employment office's unemployment insurance fund regarding the claimant's entitlement to unemployment benefits following the termination of their employment, where the central issue was the validity of the dismissal and the resulting eligibility for benefits. The court reasoned that the factual circumstances, including the reasons for the termination, did not support the lower authority's conclusion that the claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits, thereby partially or fully overturning the previous decision.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Appeal Regarding Unemployment Benefits and Validity of Dismissal: The court reasoned that the factual circumstances, including the reasons for the termination, did not support the lower authority's conclusion that the claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits, thereby partially or fully overturning the previous decision.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
droit à l'indemnité de chômage cessation d'emploi droit aux prestations d'assurance renaissance du droit à la prestation d'assurance caisse de chômage chômage
Généré par l'IA
II 2021 89
Unemployment Insurance Benefit Eligibility Appeal
II 2020 48
Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Cessation
II 2025 47
Claimant v. Employment Office: Unemployment Benefit Suspension Appeal
II 2025 38
Appeal Against Suspension of Unemployment Benefits for Refusal of Suitable Job Offer
II 2021 66
Unemployment Insurance Contribution Appeal: Employment Termination Proof

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 51 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 27. Juli 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Arbeitslosenkasse, Lückenstrasse 8, \n Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n