Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2020 50 • VG SZ II 2020 50 Généré par l'IA

Social Insurance Benefits and Imputed Spousal Income

Numéro de cause II 2020 50
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A claimant appealed a decision by the social insurance institution that calculated supplementary benefits based on a hypothetical earned income for the claimant's spouse, asserting the spouse had voluntarily foregone income. The court reasoned that such an imputation of hypothetical income is permissible under the law to prevent individuals from deliberately reducing their means to qualify for higher benefits, provided the voluntary foregone income is substantial and not based on valid reasons like caring for children or other duties impacting earning capacity.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Social Insurance Benefits and Imputed Spousal Income: The court reasoned that such an imputation of hypothetical income is permissible under the law to prevent individuals from deliberately reducing their means to qualify for higher benefits, provided the voluntary foregone income is substantial and not based on valid reasons like caring for children or other duties impacting earning capacity.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prise en compte d'un revenu hypothétique prestation d'assurance sociale revenu du conjoint assurance complémentaire capacité de gain réduite rente d'invalidité pour couple
Généré par l'IA
II 2023 39
Social Security Benefits Calculation Based on Presumed Spousal Income
II 2018 85
Appeal of Denial of Supplementary Benefits Based on Imputed Hypothetical Income
II 2018 33
Supplementary Benefits Calculation: Hypothetical Income Imputation for Non-Working Spouse
II 2021 88
Spousal Income Imputation in Supplementary Benefits Calculation
II 2020 22
Benefits Authority v. Spouse's Actual Income in Supplementary Benefits Calculation

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 50 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. September 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Aaron Steiner, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (hypothetisches Erwerbseinkommen \n der Ehefrau) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: