Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2020 26 • VG SZ II 2020 26 Généré par l'IA

Judicial Review of Unemployment Benefit Denial for Voluntary Termination

Numéro de cause II 2020 26
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An applicant sought judicial review against a decision by the unemployment insurance fund concerning the refusal of unemployment benefits following the termination of their employment relationship. The court reasoned that the applicant's voluntary termination of the employment relationship without a valid reason justified the imposition of a sanction, which included a suspension of benefit payments, and therefore upheld the fund's decision to deny benefits for the prescribed period.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Judicial Review of Unemployment Benefit Denial for Voluntary Termination: The court reasoned that the applicant's voluntary termination of the employment relationship without a valid reason justified the imposition of a sanction, which included a suspension of benefit payments, and therefore upheld the fund's decision to deny benefits for the prescribed period.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
cessation d'emploi chômage imputable à une faute de l'assuré contrôle juridictionnel suspension de la prestation d'assurance organe de l'assurance-chômage assurance chômage
Généré par l'IA
II 2023 66
Appeal of Unemployment Benefit Suspension for Voluntary Resignation
II 2022 13
Judicial Review of Unemployment Insurance Fund Decision Dismissed for Non-Admissibility
II 2023 17
Unemployment Insurance Benefits Denial After Voluntary Termination Followed by Subsequent Employment Termination
II 2023 75
Unemployment Benefit Suspension Overturned Due to Insufficient Investigation of Mutual Termination Circumstances
II 2020 91
Appeal Against Unemployment Benefit Suspension Due to Self-Inflicted Unemployment

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2020 26 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 30. März 2020 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Marco Lacher, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Gesuchsteller, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Unia Arbeitslosenkasse, Kompetenzzentrum D-CH West, \n Monbijoustrasse 61, Postfach 3398, 3001 Bern, \n Gesuchsgegnerin, |\n

\n\n

\n