Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2019 5 • VG SZ II 2019 5 Généré par l'IA

Insured Fails to Overturn Premium Surcharge Due to Presumed Receipt of Official Notice

Numéro de cause II 2019 5
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A claimant appealed a decision concerning premium surcharges for late premium payments, arguing that the administrative office did not provide sufficient notice of the deadline. The court reasoned that the administrative office's obligation to inform the insured party about the deadlines for premium surcharges was fulfilled when it sent an official notice, even if the insured party claimed not to have received it, as the timely receipt of such official communications is generally presumed unless there is evidence to the contrary, thereby upholding the decision regarding the missed deadline.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Insured Fails to Overturn Premium Surcharge Due to Presumed Receipt of Official Notice: The court reasoned that the administrative office's obligation to inform the insured party about the deadlines for premium surcharges was fulfilled when it sent an official notice, even if the insured party claimed not to have received it, as the timely receipt of such official communications is generally presumed unless there is evidence to the contrary, thereby upholding the decision regarding the missed deadline.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
supplément de prime inobservation du délai manquement de l'assureur versement de la prestation d'assurance frais de retard litige d'assurances sociales Prämienverbilligung (Fristversäumnis) | Prämienverbilligung
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 5 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. März 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Postadresse: B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Prämienverbilligung (Fristversäumnis) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: