Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2019 20 • VG SZ II 2019 20 Généré par l'IA

Waiver of Assets as Improper Disposal for Benefit Eligibility

Numéro de cause II 2019 20
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant sought supplementary benefits but was denied because the relevant compensation fund considered a voluntary waiver of assets made prior to the application to be a form of self-provision that precluded eligibility. The court reasoned that a voluntary renunciation of assets, even if made before the benefit application, constitutes an improper disposal of assets if the purpose was to gain access to supplementary benefits, thus justifying the denial of those benefits under the relevant social security law.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Waiver of Assets as Improper Disposal for Benefit Eligibility: The court reasoned that a voluntary renunciation of assets, even if made before the benefit application, constitutes an improper disposal of assets if the purpose was to gain access to supplementary benefits, thus justifying the denial of those benefits under the relevant social security law.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestations de sécurité sociale fortune renonciation aux prestations d'assurance fonds de compensation dessaisissement dans la faillite obtention frauduleuse d'une prestation Ergänzungsleistungen | java.util.HashMap/1797211028

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.
Généré par l'IA
II 2020 86
Waiver of Assets for Supplementary Benefits
II 2022 16
Claimant v. Compensation Office: Waiver of Assets and Supplementary Benefits Eligibility
II 2018 43
Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits and Asset Waiver
II 2019 30
Supplementary Benefits Denial Based on Asset Ownership Refusal
II 2016 76
Claimant v. Benefits Authority Regarding Asset Waiver

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

The court ordered the appellant to pay the costs of the federal court proceedings.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2019 20 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 22. Mai 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.oec. HSG B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Ergänzungsleistungen (Vermögensverzicht) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: