Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2018 98 • VG SZ II 2018 98 Généré par l'IA

Benefit Calculation Appeal Regarding Military Service Income Inclusion

Numéro de cause II 2018 98
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party appealed a decision regarding the calculation of benefits, specifically challenging the determination of their average income used for the benefit calculation, arguing that income earned during mandatory military service should have been included, which would have resulted in a higher benefit amount. The court upheld the prior decision, reasoning that the relevant statutory provisions and established jurisprudence permit the exclusion of income earned during mandatory military service when calculating the average income for benefit purposes, as such service is considered an interruption of normal professional activity and the income derived is not comparable to regular employment earnings.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Benefit Calculation Appeal Regarding Military Service Income Inclusion: The court upheld the prior decision, reasoning that the relevant statutory provisions and established jurisprudence permit the exclusion of income earned during mandatory military service when calculating the average income for benefit purposes, as such service is considered an interruption of normal professional activity and the income derived is not comparable to regular employment earnings.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
calcul de la prestation service militaire détermination du revenu prestation obligatoire activité soumise à cotisation allocation compensatoire Ergänzungsleistungen (Pflegefinanzierung; Wohnsitz) | Ergänzungsleistungen
Généré par l'IA
II 2020 22
Benefits Authority v. Spouse's Actual Income in Supplementary Benefits Calculation
II 2022 75
Social Security Contribution Calculation Appeal
II 2019 95
Appeal of Military Service Obligation Status Confirmation
II 2018 85
Appeal of Denial of Supplementary Benefits Based on Imputed Hypothetical Income
II 2022 7
Unemployment Insurance Earnings Calculation Appeal

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2018 98 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. April 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Achilles Humbel, Präsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch B.________, \n dieser vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt MLaw C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. Ausgleichskasse Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, \n Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, \n2. Stadt Wetzikon, Fachstelle Alter + Gesundheit, Bahnhofstrasse 167, 8620 Wetzikon ZH, \n Beigeladene, \n |\n

\n\n

\n