Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2018 92 • VG SZ II 2018 92 Généré par l'IA

Policyholder Premium Non-Payment Insurance Termination Upheld

Numéro de cause II 2018 92
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A policyholder sought court review after an insurer terminated their mandatory sickness daily allowance insurance policy under the Federal Health Insurance Act, following the policyholder's failure to pay outstanding premiums. The court determined that the insurer was entitled to terminate the contract because the policyholder had not fulfilled their obligation to pay the premiums, as required by the statutory insurance framework, and therefore upheld the termination.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Policyholder Premium Non-Payment Insurance Termination Upheld: The court determined that the insurer was entitled to terminate the contract because the policyholder had not fulfilled their obligation to pay the premiums, as required by the statutory insurance framework, and therefore upheld the termination.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
assureur résiliation assurance obligatoire des soins obligation de paiement indemnité journalière en cas de maladie suspension de la prestation d'assurance
Généré par l'IA
II 2020 88
Claimants v. Insurer Regarding Supplemental Health Insurance Termination Date
I 2012 8
Insurer's Right to Terminate for Non-Disclosure of Pre-existing Condition
I 2024 21
Insurer Upheld in Terminating Accident Benefits Due to Pre-existing Condition
ZK1 2021 45
Employer Liability for Unpaid Sickness Benefits Offset by Insurer Payment
I 2018 76
Insurance Provider v. Injured Worker (Benefits Cessation)

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2018 92 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 21. März 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ GmbH, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________ AG, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Krankenversicherung (Taggeldversicherung nach KVG; Vertragsauflösung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: