Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2018 79 • VG SZ II 2018 79 Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Benefit Entitlement During Post-Termination Salary Continuation

Numéro de cause II 2018 79
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An individual challenged a decision by the unemployment insurance office regarding the calculation of their benefit entitlement following the termination of their employment contract due to a short-term illness resulting in a period of non-receipt of salary. The court reasoned that since the insured person received salary continuation payments for the duration of the notice period, despite being medically unfit to work, they were not unemployed and therefore not entitled to unemployment insurance benefits during that time, as the right to benefits only arises upon the cessation of the employment relationship and the lack of income replacement.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Benefit Entitlement During Post-Termination Salary Continuation: The court reasoned that since the insured person received salary continuation payments for the duration of the notice period, despite being medically unfit to work, they were not unemployed and therefore not entitled to unemployment insurance benefits during that time, as the right to benefits only arises upon the cessation of the employment relationship and the lack of income replacement.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestation d'assurance-chômage durée du droit à la prestation d'assurance cessation d'emploi revenu acquis en compensation calcul de la prestation défaut de légitimation
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2018 79 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. Oktober 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Darinka Balzarini, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Arbeitslosenkasse, Lückenstrasse 8, \n Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n