Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
II 2018 55 • VG SZ II 2018 55 Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Benefits Residency Requirement Appeal

Numéro de cause II 2018 55
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerned an appeal against a decision regarding unemployment insurance benefits, specifically challenging the requirement of residency in Switzerland for entitlement. The court determined that the governing legislation stipulated continuous residence within the country as a condition for receiving unemployment benefits, and since the appellant did not meet this statutory residency requirement, the original administrative decision denying the benefits was upheld.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Unemployment Benefits Residency Requirement Appeal: The court determined that the governing legislation stipulated continuous residence within the country as a condition for receiving unemployment benefits, and since the appellant did not meet this statutory residency requirement, the original administrative decision denying the benefits was upheld.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
indemnité de chômage obligation de résidence droit aux prestations d'assurance obligation de chercher du travail qualité pour recourir prestation durable
Généré par l'IA
II 2021 102
Unemployment Insurance Eligibility Appeal
II 2021 89
Unemployment Insurance Benefit Eligibility Appeal
III 2017 93
Appeal Against Naturalization Rejection Based on Unemployment Benefits
II 2019 62
Unemployment Benefits Cessation Due to Failure to Seek Work After Relocation
II 2023 6
Unemployment Insurance Benefits Appeal: Active Job Search Requirement

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2018 55 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. Juni 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Amt für Arbeit, Lückenstrasse 8, Postfach 1181, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | \n Gegenstand · \n Arbeitslosenversicherung (Wohnsitz in der Schweiz als Anspruchsvoraussetzung;