Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
II 2018 5 • VG SZ II 2018 5 Généré par l'IA

Municipal Development Plan Recalculation Challenge

Numéro de cause II 2018 5
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The petitioners challenged a decision by a municipal council regarding the implementation of a development plan, specifically concerning the recalculation of building lot boundaries and the resulting compensation, asserting that the recalculation incorrectly reduced the usable area of their property and consequently undervalued the required compensation. The court held that the municipal council's application of the relevant planning regulations for recalculating the lot area, which relied on established spatial planning criteria and resulted in a smaller usable area, was not arbitrary or in violation of the petitioners' rights, thus affirming the lower authority's decision regarding the boundary determination and compensation calculation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Municipal Development Plan Recalculation Challenge: The court held that the municipal council's application of the relevant planning regulations for recalculating the lot area, which relied on established spatial planning criteria and resulted in a smaller usable area, was not arbitrary or in violation of the petitioners' rights, thus affirming the lower authority's decision regarding the boundary determination and compensation calculation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
plan de construction promotion immobilière révision du plan d'affectation terrain communal problème urbain droit au développement Kausalabgaben (Erschliessungsbeiträge Elektrizitätswerk) | Kausalabgaben
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n II 2018 5 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Juni 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.oec. Andreas Risi, Richter Dr.iur. Frank Lampert, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.iur. Thomas Twerenbold, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n 1. A.________, 2. B.________, Beschwerdeführer, \n beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n Gemeinderat Tuggen, Zürcherstrasse 14, Postfach 159, 8856 Tuggen, \n Vorinstanz, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt D.________, |\n

\n\n

\n