Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I 2023 91 • VG SZ I 2023 91 Généré par l'IA

Industrial Accident Suit Dismissed Due to Appellant's Improper Action

Numéro de cause I 2023 91
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An appellant, who was injured in an industrial accident involving a machine used in their work, appealed a decision that dismissed their claim for damages and pain and suffering against the machine's owner/operator, arguing that the owner failed to ensure the machine was safe. The court upheld the prior decision, reasoning that the evidence did not establish that the machine was defective or that the owner had breached any duty of care regarding maintenance or operation, as the accident's cause was determined to be the appellant's own improper actions while using the equipment.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Industrial Accident Suit Dismissed Due to Appellant's Improper Action: The court upheld the prior decision, reasoning that the evidence did not establish that the machine was defective or that the owner had breached any duty of care regarding maintenance or operation, as the accident's cause was determined to be the appellant's own improper actions while using the equipment.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
action en indemnité accidents de travail manquement au devoir résiliation injustifiée du bail action en paiement d'entretien conflit du travail
Généré par l'IA
ZK2 2021 36
Labor Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Detail Irreparable Harm from Procedural Ruling
ZK2 2017 71
Plaintiff v. Company: Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Evidence
I 2018 15
Appellant v. Insurer Regarding Delayed Shoulder Injury Claim
ZK1 2021 38
Plaintiff v. Boat Manufacturer on Appealability of Dismissal
ZK1 2018 1
Defective Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Specificity and New Claims

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2023 91 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Urteil vom 22. August 2024 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Anna Maria Rüesch, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Kläger, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n C.________ AG \n Beklagte, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin D.________ |\n \n\n

\n