Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I 2022 45 • VG SZ I 2022 45 Généré par l'IA

Accident Insurance Benefits Appeal: Causal Link in Shoulder Injury Claim

Numéro de cause I 2022 45
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A claimant appealed a decision concerning accident insurance benefits, specifically regarding the causal link between a work accident and subsequent shoulder complaints. The court reasoned that the medical evidence did not establish a sufficient causal relationship between the reported accident and the reported shoulder issues, thus upholding the prior negative determination regarding the claim for accident-related benefits.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Accident Insurance Benefits Appeal: Causal Link in Shoulder Injury Claim: The court reasoned that the medical evidence did not establish a sufficient causal relationship between the reported accident and the reported shoulder issues, thus upholding the prior negative determination regarding the claim for accident-related benefits.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestations de l'assurance-accidents lésion à l'épaule lien de causalité moyens de preuve médicaux rapport d'assurance causalité du coup du lapin
Généré par l'IA
I 2020 64
Accident Insurance Benefits Causality Appeal
I 2023 79
Accident Insurance Benefits Appeal Regarding Causal Link to Disability
I 2022 16
Appeal Against Cessation of Accident Insurance Benefits Due to Disputed Causal Link for Shoulder Injury
I 2023 6
Insurance Appeal: Causal Link in Accident Benefits
I 2019 32
Accident Insurance Benefits Causality Appeal

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2022 45 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 9. Dezember 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw Z.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________ AG, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Leistungen; Unfallkausalität Schulterbeschwerden) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: