Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I 2022 33 • VG SZ I 2022 33 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Regarding Denial of Disability Pension Based on Residual Earning Capacity

Numéro de cause I 2022 33
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant sought a disability pension from the disability insurance office, which the office rejected, leading to an appeal. The court considered whether the appellant, suffering from chronic pain conditions affecting their ability to work, met the legal threshold for disability benefits based on the medical evidence regarding their residual earning capacity in the relevant labor market. The court ultimately upheld the lower authority's decision, finding that the medical documentation did not sufficiently establish that the appellant's residual capacity for gainful employment was significantly restricted to the extent required by law to warrant the granting of a disability pension.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Appeal Regarding Denial of Disability Pension Based on Residual Earning Capacity: The court considered whether the appellant, suffering from chronic pain conditions affecting their ability to work, met the legal threshold for disability benefits based on the medical evidence regarding their residual earning capacity in the relevant labor market. The court ultimately upheld the lower authority's decision, finding that the medical documentation did not sufficiently establish that the appellant's residual capacity for gainful employment was significantly restricted to the extent required by law to warrant the granting of a disability pension.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
rente d'invalidité capacité de gain résiduelle constatation de l'aptitude au travail activité lucrative jouissance des droits civils détermination du revenu d'invalide
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2022 33 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 29. August 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Invalidenrente) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: