Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I 2022 20 • VG SZ I 2022 20 Généré par l'IA

Claimant v. Insurance Provider Regarding Disability Benefits Denial

Numéro de cause I 2022 20
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A claimant sought disability insurance benefits (a pension) following injuries sustained in a work-related traffic accident, where the initial decision and subsequent appeal both denied the claim, leading the claimant to contest the ruling regarding their degree of invalidity. The court upheld the previous decisions, reasoning that the medical evidence did not establish a degree of invalidity reaching the threshold required for the requested pension under the relevant insurance legislation, thus affirming the denial of benefits.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Claimant v. Insurance Provider Regarding Disability Benefits Denial: The court upheld the previous decisions, reasoning that the medical evidence did not establish a degree of invalidity reaching the threshold required for the requested pension under the relevant insurance legislation, thus affirming the denial of benefits.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestation de l'assurance-invalidité assurance-invalidité accident de la circulation litige d'assurances sociales motifs médicaux action directe contre l'assureur Invalidenversicherung (Rente) | Invalidenversicherung
Généré par l'IA
I 2018 27
Claimant v. Insurance Provider: Disability Benefits Denial Affirmed
I 2017 100
Claimant v. Insurance Office (Disability Benefits Denial)
I 2018 30
Denial of Disability Insurance Benefits Due to Insufficient Impairment
I 2022 69
Claimant v. Disability Insurance Office: Denial of Benefits Upheld
I 2021 44
Disability Insurance Benefits Appeal Denial Upheld

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2022 20 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 5. August 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Rente) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: