Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I 2022 2 • VG SZ I 2022 2 Généré par l'IA

Social Insurance Disability Assessment Appeal Upheld

Numéro de cause I 2022 2
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An appellant challenged a decision concerning social insurance benefits, specifically regarding the classification of a medical condition and resulting disability assessment. The court reasoned that the contested assessment, which determined the degree of occupational disability, was based on a proper, detailed medical evaluation considering all relevant objective medical facts and adhering to established legal standards for assessing impairment, thereby upholding the lower administrative body's findings.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Social Insurance Disability Assessment Appeal Upheld: The court reasoned that the contested assessment, which determined the degree of occupational disability, was based on a proper, detailed medical evaluation considering all relevant objective medical facts and adhering to established legal standards for assessing impairment, thereby upholding the lower administrative body's findings.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
évaluation de l'invalidité prestation d'assurance sociale constatations médicales objectives prestations d'invalidité de l'assuré motifs médicaux procédure d'action en matière d'assurances sociales Unfallversicherung (Unfallkausalität) | Unfallversicherung
Généré par l'IA
I 2020 3
Claimant v. Social Insurance Authority (Disability Benefits Appeal)
I 2019 15
Disability Insurance Benefits Appeal Decision Upheld
I 2020 77
Disability Benefits Appeal Affirmed on Objective Medical Evaluation
I 2020 18
Appeal Regarding Disability Benefits and Medical Assessment Validity
I 2017 103
Disability Insurance Benefits Appeal Upheld

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2022 2 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 14. April 2022 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin MLaw B.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, \n 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n