Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I 2022 1 • VG SZ I 2022 1 Généré par l'IA

Accident Insurance Causation Appeal: Meniscus Injury

Numéro de cause I 2022 1
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case involves an appeal concerning accident insurance, specifically the causal link between an alleged accident and a subsequent meniscus injury, following a second appeal stage. The appellant sought to overturn a previous decision regarding the insurance claim. The court's reasoning, while not explicitly detailed in the provided excerpt, must address the evidentiary threshold required to establish that the workplace accident was the direct and proximate cause of the claimant's specific meniscus damage for the insurance benefit to be awarded.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Accident Insurance Causation Appeal: Meniscus Injury: The appellant sought to overturn a previous decision regarding the insurance claim. The court's reasoning, while not explicitly detailed in the provided excerpt, must address the evidentiary threshold required to establish that the workplace accident was the direct and proximate cause of the claimant's specific meniscus damage for the insurance benefit to be awarded.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
causalité de l'accident demande de prestation d'assurance déchirure méniscale assurance directe lien de causalité prestations pour lésion du genou
Généré par l'IA
I 2021 56
Accident Insurance Causation Appeal
I 2019 11
Appeal Regarding Causation in Accident Insurance Claim
I 2021 78
Accident Insurance Causation Dispute
I 2020 13
Accident Insurance Benefits Denial for Meniscus Tear Based on Degenerative Cause
I 2023 13
Accident Insurance Benefits Causation Appeal

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2022 1 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Juni 2023 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Dr.med. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Unfallkausalität; Meniskusschaden / 2. Rechtsgang im Verfahren I 2021 10) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: