Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I 2020 20 • VG SZ I 2020 20 Généré par l'IA

Insurance Coverage for Accident-Like Bodily Harm

Numéro de cause I 2020 20
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Two petitioners appealed a decision concerning accident insurance coverage for an injury deemed an accident-like bodily harm, where the core issue was whether the resulting condition qualified as an insurable accident under the relevant law. The court reasoned that for an event to constitute an accident-like bodily harm, it must involve an unforeseen, sudden, and externally induced physical impact on the body that causes harm, and since the evidence presented did not sufficiently establish a sudden, external event causing the specific impairment, the appeal against the prior decision denying coverage was ultimately dismissed.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Insurance Coverage for Accident-Like Bodily Harm: The court reasoned that for an event to constitute an accident-like bodily harm, it must involve an unforeseen, sudden, and externally induced physical impact on the body that causes harm, and since the evidence presented did not sufficiently establish a sudden, external event causing the specific impairment, the appeal against the prior decision denying coverage was ultimately dismissed.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
couverture d'assurance-accidents lésion corporelle action directe contre l'assureur prestation d'assurance indue lésion corporelle par chute responsabilité pour cas fortuit
Généré par l'IA
I 2019 20
Accident Insurance Bodily Injury Appeal
I 2018 28
Appeal on Causality in Accident Insurance Coverage
I 2022 27
Insurance Coverage for Accident Claim Dispute
I 2019 11
Appeal Regarding Causation in Accident Insurance Claim
I 2019 66
Accident Insurance Coverage Causation Dispute

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2020 20 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 14. Juli 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Manuel Gamma, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n 1. A.________, 2. B.________, Beschwerdeführer, beide vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. C.________, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (unfallähnliche Körperschädigung; 2. Rechtsgang im Verfahren I 2019 20) |\n

\n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: