Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I 2020 102 • VG SZ I 2020 102 Généré par l'IA

Invalidity Pension Claim Denial Based on Insufficient Medical Evidence of Impairment

Numéro de cause I 2020 102
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant sought an invalidity pension from the social insurance provider, who rejected the claim because the medical evidence did not substantiate a sustained, significant impairment of earning capacity resulting from a pre-existing condition. The court affirmed the rejection, reasoning that the medical assessment, particularly regarding the duration and severity of the health issue and its impact on work capacity, did not meet the legal threshold required for granting an invalidity pension under the relevant social insurance law.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 65 Abs. 1 ATSG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 ATSG; Invalidity Pension Claim Denial Based on Insufficient Medical Evidence of Impairment: The court affirmed the rejection, reasoning that the medical assessment, particularly regarding the duration and severity of the health issue and its impact on work capacity, did not meet the legal threshold required for granting an invalidity pension under the relevant social insurance law.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
pension d'invalidité évaluation de la capacité de travail atteinte à la santé motifs médicaux assurance maladie allégations de santé Invalidenversicherung (Rente) | Invalidenversicherung

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 1 ATSG

The appeal is partially granted and the decision of the IV authority is set aside to the extent that the claimant was not granted an initial assessment.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 ATSG

The respondent authority must bear the judicial costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2020 102 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 17. Mai 2021 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Tanja Marty, a.o. Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Rente) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: