Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I 2019 11 • VG SZ I 2019 11 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Regarding Causation in Accident Insurance Claim

Numéro de cause I 2019 11
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case involves an appeal regarding accident insurance coverage where the appellant sought a determination that a subsequent health issue was causally linked to a prior work accident. The lower court had denied the claim, concluding that the necessary causal link between the work accident and the subsequent condition was not established according to the evidence. The court, reviewing the factual findings and expert opinions, ultimately upheld the prior decision, reasoning that the medical evidence did not sufficiently demonstrate that the subsequent condition was a direct consequence or a probable sequela of the initial work-related incident, thus failing to meet the required threshold for accident insurance causation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Appeal Regarding Causation in Accident Insurance Claim: The lower court had denied the claim, concluding that the necessary causal link between the work accident and the subsequent condition was not established according to the evidence. The court, reviewing the factual findings and expert opinions, ultimately upheld the prior decision, reasoning that the medical evidence did not sufficiently demonstrate that the subsequent condition was a direct consequence or a probable sequela of the initial work-related incident, thus failing to meet the required threshold for accident insurance causation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
causalité de l'accident assurance-maladie et accidents moyens de preuve médicaux assurance directe lien de causalité recours de l'assureur Unfallversicherung (Kausalität) | Unfallversicherung
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2019 11 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 11. September 2019 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin Dr.iur. HSG B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Kausalität) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: