Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I 2018 13 • VG SZ I 2018 13 Généré par l'IA

Accident Insurance Appeal Timeliness via Email Challenge

Numéro de cause I 2018 13
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A claimant challenged a decision within the context of accident insurance by submitting their appeal via email, leading to the pre-hearing body rejecting the appeal as untimely and procedurally defective. The court reasoned that an appeal submission via email does not meet the statutory requirements for a timely and formal objection, which generally mandates a written form requiring a physical signature, thus upholding the rejection of the appeal based on procedural grounds.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Accident Insurance Appeal Timeliness via Email Challenge: The court reasoned that an appeal submission via email does not meet the statutory requirements for a timely and formal objection, which generally mandates a written form requiring a physical signature, thus upholding the rejection of the appeal based on procedural grounds.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
exigence de signature assurance-accidents légale griefs de procédure moyens invocables production de créance moyens tardifs
Généré par l'IA
I 2019 98
Claimant v. Insurer (Delay in Insurance Benefits and Documentation)
I 2023 14
Accident Insurance Causality Appeal
I 2019 39
Accident Insurance Causality Dispute Appeal
II 2020 13
Insurance Premium Reduction Application Timeliness Appeal
I 2021 56
Accident Insurance Causation Appeal

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2018 13 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. Mai 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. B.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach 4358, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (fristund formgerechte Einspracheerhebung; E-Mail-Einsprache) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: