Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I 2017 8 • VG SZ I 2017 8 Généré par l'IA

Disability Insurance Appeal Reaffirming Existing Medical Evaluation

Numéro de cause I 2017 8
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The claimant appealed a decision regarding disability insurance, challenging the required medical evaluation, after an earlier application for benefits was denied based on existing medical evidence. The court reasoned that since the claimant had not presented any new medical findings or pointed out specific factual errors in the previous expert opinions, the lower court was justified in upholding the existing determination that the claimant had not demonstrated a significant change in their medical condition warranting a reassessment of disability status.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Disability Insurance Appeal Reaffirming Existing Medical Evaluation: The court reasoned that since the claimant had not presented any new medical findings or pointed out specific factual errors in the previous expert opinions, the lower court was justified in upholding the existing determination that the claimant had not demonstrated a significant change in their medical condition warranting a reassessment of disability status.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestation de l'assurance-invalidité réévaluation médicale moyens de preuve médicaux expertise judiciaire affection de la santé dans l'assurance militaire renaissance de la qualité d'assuré Invalidenversicherung (Begutachtung) | Invalidenversicherung
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 8 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. Mai 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________ \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Dr.iur. Daniel Candrian, \n Weidhuobli 29, 6430 Schwyz, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Begutachtung) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: