Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I 2017 79 • VG SZ I 2017 79 Généré par l'IA

Claimant v. Denial of Disability Benefits for Chronic Pain

Numéro de cause I 2017 79
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A claimant appealed a decision denying them disability insurance benefits based on an assessment finding they possessed residual work capacity in the general labor market, despite suffering from chronic pain following an accident that necessitated extensive medical treatment. The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the medical documentation, including expert opinions, did not establish a severe and long-lasting impairment of the claimant's physical or mental health that would preclude them from performing any gainful employment, thus affirming the lower administrative body's determination of residual capacity.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 65 BGG; Claimant v. Denial of Disability Benefits for Chronic Pain: The court upheld the denial, reasoning that the medical documentation, including expert opinions, did not establish a severe and long-lasting impairment of the claimant's physical or mental health that would preclude them from performing any gainful employment, thus affirming the lower administrative body's determination of residual capacity.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestations d'assurance-invalidité expertise médicale atteinte chronique à la santé assurance maladie constatation de l'aptitude au travail prestations de l'assurance-accidents Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) | Invalidenversicherung

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 65 BGG
The decision regarding the costs was based on this article.
Généré par l'IA
I 2019 76
Insurance Benefits Denial for Chronic Pain Syndrome
I 2023 2
Appeal of Denial of Disability Benefits for Chronic Symptoms
I 2022 69
Claimant v. Disability Insurance Office: Denial of Benefits Upheld
I 2021 75
Disability Benefits Denial Upheld Despite Chronic Pain and Psychosocial Factors
I 2021 7
Disability Benefits Denial Upheld Due to Insufficient Proof of Work-Limiting Impairment

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 65 BGG

The decision regarding the costs was based on this article.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 79 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 14. März 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Z.________, |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: