Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I 2017 73 • VG SZ I 2017 73 Généré par l'IA

Claimant v. Disability Insurance Benefits Administration

Numéro de cause I 2017 73
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The petitioner, a claimant for disability insurance benefits, appealed a decision denying her disability pension, stemming from a work-related accident in 2011 that led to various physical ailments including severe neck and back problems, headaches, and psychological distress, where the administrative body concluded that the claimant retained significant earning capacity in the open labor market despite persistent pain and medical findings. The court, in affirming the prior decision, reasoned that the administrative body correctly evaluated the totality of the medical evidence and functional limitations, finding that the petitioner was still capable of gainful employment commensurate with her residual physical and psychological capacity, thus failing to meet the threshold for a full disability pension under the relevant insurance statutes.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Claimant v. Disability Insurance Benefits Administration: The court, in affirming the prior decision, reasoned that the administrative body correctly evaluated the totality of the medical evidence and functional limitations, finding that the petitioner was still capable of gainful employment commensurate with her residual physical and psychological capacity, thus failing to meet the threshold for a full disability pension under the relevant insurance statutes.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestations d'assurance-invalidité demande de prestation d'assurance organe de l'assurance-accidents constatation de l'aptitude au travail activité lucrative motifs médicaux Invalidenversicherung (Rente) | Invalidenversicherung
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 73 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 15. November 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Josef Mathis, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n D._____, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Christian Haag, \n Schwanenplatz 7, Postfach, 6002 Luzern, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Rente) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: