Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I 2017 45 • VG SZ I 2017 45 Généré par l'IA

Insurance Benefits Denial Appeal Upheld on Residual Work Capacity

Numéro de cause I 2017 45
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant sought disability insurance benefits following a work-related accident resulting in an impaired ability to work, but the initial insurance provider denied the claim based on a specialist's opinion suggesting the claimant could still perform sedentary work, leading to an appeal. The court reviewed the medical documentation and expert findings, ultimately affirming the lower court's decision that the objective medical evidence did not sufficiently substantiate a degree of incapacity that warranted the continuation or granting of disability benefits beyond what had already been assessed, thereby upholding the denial based on the medical expert's assessment of residual capacity for work.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Insurance Benefits Denial Appeal Upheld on Residual Work Capacity: The court reviewed the medical documentation and expert findings, ultimately affirming the lower court's decision that the objective medical evidence did not sufficiently substantiate a degree of incapacity that warranted the continuation or granting of disability benefits beyond what had already been assessed, thereby upholding the denial based on the medical expert's assessment of residual capacity for work.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestation de l'assurance-invalidité capacité de travail moyens de preuve médicaux prestations d'assurance-accidents droit à la prestation d'assurance évaluation de l'incapacité de travail Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) | Invalidenversicherung
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 45 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 23. Oktober 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n D.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. David Husmann, \n Alderstrasse 40, 8008 Zürich, Postfach, 8034 Zürich, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: