Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I 2017 4 • VG SZ I 2017 4 Généré par l'IA

Disability Pension Discontinuation Following Vocational Rehabilitation Review

Numéro de cause I 2017 4
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A claimant appealed a decision regarding disability insurance benefits, stemming from a previous vocational rehabilitation measure that the insurance office subsequently discontinued, leading to a review of the entitlement to a disability pension. The court reasoned that since the claimant had regained sufficient earning capacity after the conclusion of the rehabilitation program, which was the basis for the prior benefit decision, the administrative body was justified in reviewing and ultimately discontinuing the disability pension due to the non-occurrence of the prerequisites for its continued payment.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Disability Pension Discontinuation Following Vocational Rehabilitation Review: The court reasoned that since the claimant had regained sufficient earning capacity after the conclusion of the rehabilitation program, which was the basis for the prior benefit decision, the administrative body was justified in reviewing and ultimately discontinuing the disability pension due to the non-occurrence of the prerequisites for its continued payment.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
réexamen de la rente d'invalidité réadaptation professionnelle droit à la rente versement continu des prestations prestations d'assurance nouvelle demande de prestations d'invalidité Invalidenversicherung (Rente) | Invalidenversicherung
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 4 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 7. Februar 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n C.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Prof.Dr.iur. Hardy Landolt, LL.M., \n Schweizerhofstrasse 14, Postfach 568, 8750 Glarus, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Rente) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: