Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I 2017 13 • VG SZ I 2017 13 Généré par l'IA

Accident Insurance Daily Sickness Benefit Calculation Dispute

Numéro de cause I 2017 13
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerned a dispute over daily sickness benefits under accident insurance, where the insured party appealed a prior decision. The core issue revolved around the proper calculation or entitlement to these benefits following an accident. The court's reasoning, though the full reasoning is not detailed, addressed the specific facts of the claim within the context of accident insurance law to reach its judgment on the validity of the prior ruling regarding the daily allowances.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Accident Insurance Daily Sickness Benefit Calculation Dispute: The core issue revolved around the proper calculation or entitlement to these benefits following an accident. The court's reasoning, though the full reasoning is not detailed, addressed the specific facts of the claim within the context of accident insurance law to reach its judgment on the validity of the prior ruling regarding the daily allowances.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestation de l'assurance-accidents assurance d'une indemnité journalière calcul de la prestation surassurance droit aux prestations litige d'assurances sociales Unfallversicherung (Taggeldleistungen) | Unfallversicherung
Généré par l'IA
I 2022 25
Claimant v. Insurer Regarding Sickness Benefit Calculation Including Variable Compensation
I 2019 80
Dispute Over Sickness Daily Benefits
I 2021 3
Accident Insurance Benefits Causality Dispute
I 2018 109
Accident Insurance Benefits Causation Dispute
I 2021 31
Accident Insurance Benefits Causation Dispute

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 13 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 26. Juli 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Stefan Getzmann, Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Markus Sigg, \n Industriestrasse 5a, Postfach 123, 6210 Sursee, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n B.________ AG, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Taggeldleistungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: