Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I 2017 113 • VG SZ I 2017 113 Généré par l'IA

Appeal of Denial of Disability Benefits Due to Visual Impairment

Numéro de cause I 2017 113
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellant sought disability insurance benefits for a severe persistent visual impairment that began following an accident, arguing that the resulting limitation prevented substantial gainful employment, despite initial assessments finding no material impediment to the previous occupation. The court upheld the lower authority's decision to deny benefits, reasoning that the relevant medical assessments demonstrated that the sustained impairment, while recognized, did not result in the requisite degree of occupational limitation necessary to qualify for an invalidity pension under the governing insurance provisions.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 65 Abs. 2 ATSG, Art. 65 Abs. 1 ATSG, Art. 68 Abs. 5 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Appeal of Denial of Disability Benefits Due to Visual Impairment: The court upheld the lower authority's decision to deny benefits, reasoning that the relevant medical assessments demonstrated that the sustained impairment, while recognized, did not result in the requisite degree of occupational limitation necessary to qualify for an invalidity pension under the governing insurance provisions.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
impact visuel prestations d'assurance-invalidité pension d'invalidité demande de prestation d'assurance assurance accident de travail motifs médicaux Invalidenversicherung (Rentenanspruch) | Invalidenversicherung

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 65 Abs. 2 ATSG

The appeal is partially upheld based on this provision concerning the claim for an invalidity pension.

Art. 65 Abs. 1 ATSG

The appeal is partially upheld based on this provision concerning the claim for an invalidity pension.

Art. 68 Abs. 5 BGG

This procedural article is cited regarding the decision on the appeal concerning the award of an invalidity pension.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Costs are allocated based on this provision.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 113 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 11. April 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n C.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Luca Barmettler, \n Bahnhofstrasse 8, 6403 Küssnacht, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Rentenanspruch) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: