Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I 2017 11 • VG SZ I 2017 11 Généré par l'IA

Claimant v. Social Insurance Office Regarding Disability Benefits Increase

Numéro de cause I 2017 11
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A claimant appealed a decision by the social insurance office denying further disability benefits based on a medical assessment finding no significant change in the claimant's residual capacity following treatment for a work-related injury that resulted in a loss of earning capacity. The court ultimately upheld the insurance office's decision, reasoning that the medical evidence presented did not demonstrate a deterioration in the claimant's health or a change in the degree of impairment sufficient to warrant an increase in the initially assessed disability pension.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Claimant v. Social Insurance Office Regarding Disability Benefits Increase: The court ultimately upheld the insurance office's decision, reasoning that the medical evidence presented did not demonstrate a deterioration in the claimant's health or a change in the degree of impairment sufficient to warrant an increase in the initially assessed disability pension.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestation de l'assurance-invalidité litige d'assurances sociales augmentation de rente atteinte à la santé instruction médicale complémentaire administration des assurances sociales Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) | Invalidenversicherung
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 11 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 16. Mai 2017 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________ \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt lic.iur. Hans Werner Stössel, \n Wylenstrasse 8, Postfach 556, 6440 Brunnen, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Leistungen) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: