Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
I 2017 104 • VG SZ I 2017 104 Généré par l'IA

Disability Pension Revision Appeal Dismissed Due to Insufficient Proof of Increased Impairment

Numéro de cause I 2017 104
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appeal concerned the revision of a disability insurance pension following a sustained injury; the claimant, who had previously received a pension based on an occupational limitation, sought an increase after further medical evaluations indicated a continued or increased impairment, while the administrative body had denied the revision request. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the medical documentation did not sufficiently establish a significant, permanent change in the claimant's earning capacity that would warrant a revision of the previously assessed level of disability insurance benefit as required under the relevant statute.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Disability Pension Revision Appeal Dismissed Due to Insufficient Proof of Increased Impairment: The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, reasoning that the medical documentation did not sufficiently establish a significant, permanent change in the claimant's earning capacity that would warrant a revision of the previously assessed level of disability insurance benefit as required under the relevant statute.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
révision de la rente d'invalidité prestation de l'assurance-invalidité prestations de prévoyance professionnelle motifs médicaux renaissance du droit à la prestation d'assurance augmentation de rente Invalidenversicherung (Rentenrevision) | Invalidenversicherung
Généré par l'IA

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 104 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 7. Februar 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Pierre Lichtenhahn, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Philipp Mazenauer, a.o. Gerichtsschreiber |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n C.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. Barbara Laur, \n Ankerstrasse 24, Postfach 9822, 8036 Zürich, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Invalidenversicherung (Rentenrevision) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: