Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I 2017 100 • VG SZ I 2017 100 Généré par l'IA

Claimant v. Insurance Office (Disability Benefits Denial)

Numéro de cause I 2017 100
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A claimant sought disability benefits from the relevant insurance office after being partially employed following an industrial accident, which the insurance office denied based on a medical assessment finding no significant long-term limitations affecting her earning capacity in the current job market. The court upheld the insurance office's decision, reasoning that the medical assessment, which indicated the claimant could perform work suitable to her training and experience with reasonable accommodations, was factually sound and legally appropriate, thereby supporting the conclusion that the threshold for granting the disability pension had not been met.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Claimant v. Insurance Office (Disability Benefits Denial): The court upheld the insurance office's decision, reasoning that the medical assessment, which indicated the claimant could perform work suitable to her training and experience with reasonable accommodations, was factually sound and legally appropriate, thereby supporting the conclusion that the threshold for granting the disability pension had not been met.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestation de l'assurance-invalidité capacité de travail partielle motifs médicaux production de créance décision partielle prestations d'assurance-accidents Invalidenversicherung (Rentenrevision) | Invalidenversicherung
Généré par l'IA
I 2019 55
Claimant v. Disability Insurance Office (Disability Benefits Appeal)
I 2022 69
Claimant v. Disability Insurance Office: Denial of Benefits Upheld
I 2022 20
Claimant v. Insurance Provider Regarding Disability Benefits Denial
I 2021 44
Disability Insurance Benefits Appeal Denial Upheld
I 2017 73
Claimant v. Disability Insurance Benefits Administration

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2017 100 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 4. April 2018 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n lic.iur. Gion Tomaschett, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n MLaw Joëlle Sigrist, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | |

|\n Parteien |\n A.________, \n Beschwerdeführerin, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwältin lic.iur. Petra Oehmke, \n Bahnhofplatz 9, Postfach 976, 8910 Affoltern, |\n

\n|\n |\n gegen |\n

\n|\n |\n \n \n1. IV-Stelle Schwyz, Rechtsdienst, Postfach 53, 6431 Schwyz, \n Vorinstanz, \n2. B.________ (Pensionskasse), \n Beigeladene, \n |\n

\n\n

\n