Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
I 2016 33 • VG SZ I 2016 33 Généré par l'IA

Appellant Seeks Reimbursement for Home Care Exceeding Statutory Benefits

Numéro de cause I 2016 33
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Schwytz (CH-SZ)
Date de la décision
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An appellant sought reimbursement for home care contributions following an accident, appealing a decision that denied the claim. The court reasoned that the appellant had not sufficiently demonstrated that the necessary care exceeded the scope covered by the standard statutory benefits, particularly regarding the extent and continuity of the required assistance, thereby upholding the previous ruling.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Appellant Seeks Reimbursement for Home Care Exceeding Statutory Benefits: The court reasoned that the appellant had not sufficiently demonstrated that the necessary care exceeded the scope covered by the standard statutory benefits, particularly regarding the extent and continuity of the required assistance, thereby upholding the previous ruling.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
prestation statutaire créance de cotisation soins à domicile recours de l'assureur indemnisation du dommage corporel remboursement de l'aide sociale Unfallversicherung (Hauspflegebeitrag) | Unfallversicherung
Généré par l'IA
II 2018 37
Recipient Appeal on Supplementary Benefit Coverage for Hospital and Home Care Costs
I 2018 82
Claimant v. Social Insurance Office: Care Allowance Supplement for Home Care
ZK1 2021 25
Appeal Dismissed for Insufficient Substantiation of Reimbursement Claim
I 2019 74
Accident Insurance: Coverage for Non-Medical Basic Care and Direct Service Provision Principle
II 2022 48
Maintenance Arrears Offset Against Supplementary Benefits

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

\n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n I 2016 33 |\n |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n |\n Entscheid vom 12. Juli 2016 |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Besetzung |\n Dr.iur. Vital Zehnder, Vizepräsident |\n \n|\n |\n Dr.med. Bernhard Zumsteg, Richter Dr.med. Urs Gössi, Richter |\n \n|\n |\n lic.iur. Prisca Reichlin Brügger, Gerichtsschreiberin |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Parteien |\n B.________, \n Beschwerdeführer, \n vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt A.________ |\n \n|\n |\n gegen |\n \n|\n |\n Suva, Rechtsabteilung, Fluhmattstrasse 1, Postfach 4358, 6002 Luzern, \n Vorinstanz, |\n \n\n

\n \n \n \n \n \n

\n\n| | | |\n Gegenstand |\n Unfallversicherung (Hauspflegebeitrag) |\n \n\n

\n \n

Sachverhalt: