Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
SK 05 142 • KG LU SK 05 142 Généré par l'IA

Creditor v. Debtor (Website Listing Liquidated Damages)

Numéro de cause SK 05 142
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

In a debt collection matter where a creditor sought enforcement based on a written contract acknowledging debt for a website listing, the dispute concerned the extent to which a contractually agreed-upon liquidated damage clause (stipulated at 70% of the net price upon early termination) served as a provisional title for legal authorization. The court reasoned that the debt enforcement judge must summarily determine the permissible amount of a penalty or liquidated damage sum in the authorization procedure pursuant to relevant articles of the Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy Act and the Code of Obligations; finding that the lower court's reduction of the liquidated damages to 15% of the net price was appropriate because, given the immediate cancellation just one business day after signing, this amount reasonably covered initial administrative costs while preventing compensation for work not yet performed, aligning with the principle that excessively high penalties must be judicially moderated.

Regeste Legislator

Officiel

Art. 82 SchKG; Art. 163 Abs. 3 OR. Der Rechtsöffnungsrichter hat im Rechtsöffnungsverfahren die zulässige Höhe einer Konventionalstrafe oder einer Schadenspauschale auf summarische Weise festzulegen und hierfür Rechtsöffnung zu erteilen. | Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
poursuite pour dettes résiliation atteinte au crédit objet du litige compétence en matière de contrats conclus par les consommateurs créance dans la faillite

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 82 SchKG
Cited as the basis for granting provisional enforcement (Rechtsöffnung) based on the written recognition of debt.
Art. 163 Abs. 3 OR
Cited as the legal basis allowing the judge in the enforcement proceedings to summarily determine and reduce an excessively high penalty clause or fixed damages amount.
Généré par l'IA
SK 05 16
Creditor v. Debtor (Promissory Note Enforcement)
OG 1995 31
Creditor Enforcement Actions as Basis for Security for Costs
SK 02 24
Creditor's Demand for Bankruptcy Based on Partially Enforced Debt Void
OG 1991 57
Former Employee's Claim in Composition Agreement Dismissed for Premature Enforcement
SK 03 53
Creditor's Right to Provisional Attachment Despite Debt Contestation Proceedings

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 82 SchKG

Cited as the basis for granting provisional enforcement (Rechtsöffnung) based on the written recognition of debt.

Art. 163 Abs. 3 OR

Cited as the legal basis allowing the judge in the enforcement proceedings to summarily determine and reduce an excessively high penalty clause or fixed damages amount.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkurskommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Schuldbetreibungs- und Konkursrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 18.01.2006

Fallnummer: · SK 05 142

LGVE: · 2006 I Nr. 50

Leitsatz: · Art. 82 SchKG; Art. 163 Abs. 3 OR. Der Rechtsöffnungsrichter hat im Rechtsöffnungsverfahren die zulässige Höhe einer Konventionalstrafe oder einer Schadenspauschale auf summarische Weise festzulegen und hierfür Rechtsöffnung zu erteilen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.