Appeal on Improper Summons in Foreign Judgment Affecting Execution Authorization

The appeal was granted because the creditor could not refute the debtor's objection that he was not properly summoned in the underlying civil proceedings.

This article governs the allocation of costs, which is implicitly decided by the outcome, although the specific cost order is not explicitly detailed in the provided text snippet for the dispositive section. Given the context of court decisions, if the substantive ruling is made, cost articles are usually cited in the final orders, but since the provided text only has an introductory summary referencing this article, and no final numbered dispositive is given where costs are explicitly ordered based on this specific article (only the outcome is mentioned), I must adhere strictly to the instruction: 'Include a provision only if it is explicitly cited in the dispositive (the numbered orders at the end of the decision)'. As the provided text only shows the reasoning section leading to the decision and a summary repeating the substantive law, and lacks the numbered final orders explicitly citing cost rules, I cannot include Art. 66 al. 1 LTF unless it was in the actual dispositive.