Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
KA 09 86 • KG LU KA 09 86 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Dismissed: Lack of Standing in Swiss Cross Misuse Case

Numéro de cause KA 09 86
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court reviewed an appeal by an entity against the dismissal of a criminal investigation initiated due to allegations that another entity unlawfully used the Swiss cross on packaging for cheese manufactured abroad, violating trademark, unfair competition, and emblem protection laws. The court determined that the appealing entity lacked standing as a private prosecutor under the relevant procedural law because, despite alleging offenses against public interest, it failed to assert any direct, personal injury resulting from the alleged misconduct, as its stated interest was solely the general protection of the public; consequently, without a direct injury, the entity could not be considered an aggrieved party authorized to appeal the prosecutor's decision to discontinue the investigation.

Regeste Legislator

Officiel

§ 35 Abs. 2 StPO. Privatklagelegitimation und Begriff der unmittelbaren Interessenverletzung in Zusammenhang mit Immaterialgüterrechten. | Strafprozessrecht

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
qualité pour recourir enquête pénale manquement de procédure licenciement abusif recevabilité du ministère public protection des marques

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 35 Abs. 2 StPO
The court based its decision not to proceed with the appeal on the fact that the appellant (Y. AG) did not qualify as a private prosecutor under this provision because its own interests were not immediately affected.
§ 137 Abs. 1 StPO
This provision was referenced to confirm the appellant's right to appeal against the discontinuation of the criminal investigation, although the appeal was ultimately dismissed based on § 35 Abs. 2 StPO.
Généré par l'IA
2N 17 104
Appeal Dismissal for Lack of Standing in False Testimony Case Pending Civil Suit
2N 16 73
Complainant Standing to Appeal Dismissal of Property Damage Case
V 11 233 1
Municipality Appeal Against Civil Defense Fund Use Letter Dismissed for Lack of Appealable Decision and Standing
2N 13 74
Complainant Lacks Standing to Appeal Partial Dismissal Order in Document Offense Case
KA 05 19
Appeal Dismissed in Negligent Harm Case Over Rope-Crossing Fall

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 35 Abs. 2 StPO

The court based its decision not to proceed with the appeal on the fact that the appellant (Y. AG) did not qualify as a private prosecutor under this provision because its own interests were not immediately affected.

§ 137 Abs. 1 StPO

This provision was referenced to confirm the appellant's right to appeal against the discontinuation of the criminal investigation, although the appeal was ultimately dismissed based on § 35 Abs. 2 StPO.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · Kriminal- und Anklagekommission

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 24.06.2009

Fallnummer: · KA 09 86

LGVE: · 2009 I Nr. 58

Leitsatz: · § 35 Abs. 2 StPO. Privatklagelegitimation und Begriff der unmittelbaren Interessenverletzung in Zusammenhang mit Immaterialgüterrechten.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.