Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
KA 09 135 • KG LU KA 09 135 Généré par l'IA

Police Driver Negligence in Mobile Vehicle Stop

Numéro de cause KA 09 135
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

In a case involving a police operation to apprehend a suspect during a planned drug exchange, where officers opted for a dynamic mobile stop by moving to intercept and slow down the suspect's vehicle, resulting in a collision and damage to both cars, the court addressed a private criminal complaint for negligent bodily harm against the police driver. The court reasoned that the procedural guidelines cited by the complainant were mere recommendations, not legally binding on police tactics, and that the decision to use a mobile stop fell within the justified discretion of the police, as it was deemed necessary to prevent the flight of a suspect wanted for serious drug offenses. Furthermore, the court found that the method of stopping—blocking the target vehicle with a police car using flashing lights, even if it led to a minor collision—was proportionate under Article 14 of the Penal Code, as it was a necessary and suitable reactive measure given the limited time and options available to the officer in a situation where the suspect appeared poised to evade apprehension.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 14 StGB, Art. 125 StGB, Art. 9 dieses, Art. 20 kann, Art. 9 dieses Gesetzes, Art. 20; Police Driver Negligence in Mobile Vehicle Stop: The court reasoned that the procedural guidelines cited by the complainant were mere recommendations, not legally binding on police tactics, and that the decision to use a mobile stop fell within the justified discretion of the police, as it was deemed necessary to prevent the flight of a suspect wanted for serious drug offenses. Furthermore, the court found that the method of stopping—blocking the target vehicle with a police car using flashing lights, even if it led to a minor collision—was proportionate under Article 14 of the Penal Code, as it was a necessary and suitable reactive measure given the limited time and options available to the officer in a situation where the suspect appeared poised to evade apprehension.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
appréhension lésion corporelle par négligence infraction pénale utilisation du téléphone au volant séquestre de véhicule contravention à la circulation

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 14 StGB
This provision provides the legal basis for assessing the lawfulness of the police action (justification defense).
Art. 125 StGB
Art. 9 dieses
Art. 20 kann
Art. 9 dieses Gesetzes
Cited as the statutory basis allowing the Cantonal Police to stop persons for identity verification during a search or law enforcement.
Art. 20
Cited as the legal authorization for the police to use direct coercion against persons and property to fulfill their duties, covering the use of police vehicles in the stop.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 14 StGB

This provision provides the legal basis for assessing the lawfulness of the police action (justification defense).

Art. 5 des luzernischen Gesetzes über die Kantonspolizei (SRL Nr. 350)

Cited as part of the legal framework under which the police must operate, supporting the justification for the arrest procedure.

Art. 9 dieses Gesetzes

Cited as the statutory basis allowing the Cantonal Police to stop persons for identity verification during a search or law enforcement.

Art. 20

Cited as the legal authorization for the police to use direct coercion against persons and property to fulfill their duties, covering the use of police vehicles in the stop.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · Kriminalund Anklagekommission Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht Entscheiddatum: · 05.10.2009 Fallnummer: · KA 09 135 LGVE: · 2009 I Nr. 44 Leitsatz: · Art. 14 StGB. Voraussetzungen für eine mobile Anhaltung durch die Polizei. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.