Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
KA 03 47 • KG LU KA 03 47 Généré par l'IA

Private Complainant's Cost Appeal in Battery Penalty Order Dismissed

Numéro de cause KA 03 47
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Following a private criminal complaint, an accused individual was convicted of battery via a penalty order which imposed a fine and allocated official and party costs, prompting the private complainant to file a cost appeal arguing for the transfer of their party costs to the accused. The court determined that an appeal under the relevant statute is only admissible against cost decisions made when an investigation is discontinued, whereas here the accused was convicted, meaning the cost allocation in a penalty order is not subject to this specific cost appeal, but rather to a different type of complaint before the public prosecutor's office, leading the commission to dismiss the appeal but forward the filings to the competent authority.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

§ 284 StPO, § 261 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO, § 262 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO, § 47 Abs. 2 StPO; Private Complainant's Cost Appeal in Battery Penalty Order Dismissed: The court determined that an appeal under the relevant statute is only admissible against cost decisions made when an investigation is discontinued, whereas here the accused was convicted, meaning the cost allocation in a penalty order is not subject to this specific cost appeal, but rather to a different type of complaint before the public prosecutor's office, leading the commission to dismiss the appeal but forward the filings to the competent authority.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
dénonciation pénale frais d'enquête pénale réduction de l'amende classement pour lésions corporelles action pénale privée état des charges

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
§ 284 StPO
The court used this provision to declare the cost appeal inadmissible because it was filed against a penalty order, not an order to discontinue the proceedings.
§ 261 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO
The court cited this provision as the correct legal remedy (appeal on points of fact or arbitrary decisions) applicable to cost rulings in a penalty order.
§ 262 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO
The court cited this provision to establish that the State Prosecutor's Office, not the Criminal and Indictment Commission, is the competent authority for the correct appeal specified in § 261 StPO.
§ 47 Abs. 2 StPO
The court cited this provision to order the forwarding of the submission to the competent State Prosecutor's Office.
Généré par l'IA
21 06 161
Convicted Person's Liability for Private Complainant's Attorney Fees
KA 02 159
Complainant Withdrawal and Defense Costs in Minor Offense Case
2N 13 52
Admissibility of Compensation and Cost Claims Following Partial Conviction Appeal and Dismissal
KA 05 142
Prosecutor's Inferred Request and Cost Allocation in Dismissed Criminal Proceedings
2N 17 118
Father's Appeal of Battery Investigation Dismissal Rejected Due to Lack of Standing and Parental Consent

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 284 StPO

The court used this provision to declare the cost appeal inadmissible because it was filed against a penalty order, not an order to discontinue the proceedings.

§ 261 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO

The court cited this provision as the correct legal remedy (appeal on points of fact or arbitrary decisions) applicable to cost rulings in a penalty order.

§ 262 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO

The court cited this provision to establish that the State Prosecutor's Office, not the Criminal and Indictment Commission, is the competent authority for the correct appeal specified in § 261 StPO.

§ 47 Abs. 2 StPO

The court cited this provision to order the forwarding of the submission to the competent State Prosecutor's Office.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · Kriminalund Anklagekommission Rechtsgebiet: · Strafprozessrecht Entscheiddatum: · 02.07.2003 Fallnummer: · KA 03 47 LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 74 Leitsatz: · § 284 StPO. Unzulässigkeit des Kostenrekurses bei Strafverfügungen. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.