Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
30 05 9 • KG LU 30 05 9 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Dismissed: Repeated FFE Release Requests Without New Facts

Numéro de cause 30 05 9
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court dismissed an appeal against a decision not to proceed with a challenge to the continuation of a person's protective custody (FFE), reasoning that while the right to request release from FFE is available at any time under the principle of good faith, repeated requests made at unreasonable intervals without presenting new facts warrant dismissal due to a lack of interest in legal protection. The initial protective custody and its continuation had been thoroughly examined in prior, recent decisions, and the appellant failed to demonstrate any changed circumstances that would justify an immediate review, making the lower court's refusal to rule on the merits appropriate.

Regeste Legislator

Officiel

Art. 397d Abs. 2 ZGB. Die Einreichung von aufeinander folgenden Entlassungsgesuchen aus der fürsorgerischen Freiheitsentziehung (FFE) steht unter dem Vorbehalt des Handelns nach Treu und Glauben. | Familienrecht

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
licenciement avec effet immédiat recours contre décision de renvoi défaut de preuve modification des circonstances contrôle juridictionnel protection juridique

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 397d Abs. 2 ZGB
Cited in the reasoning section as the legal basis allowing repeated appeals regarding release from compulsory treatment, which informs the context of the case's procedural history.
Art. 397a ZGB
Art. 397d ZGB
Leitsatz: · Art. 397d Abs.
Art. 5 Ziff. 4 EMRK
Art. 31 Abs. 4 BV
Art. 5 EMRK
Art. 31 BV

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
BGE 130 III 729
Litigant's Right to Immediate Release Under Article 397d Limited by Good Faith Principle
BGE 124 II 1
Asylum Seeker Detention Extension and Hunger Strike Bar on New Release Application
BGE 126 I 26
B. v. Switzerland: Restriction on Self-Authored Release Applications in Pre-Trial Detention
BGE 123 I 31
Suspect's Challenge to Pre-Trial Detention and Excessive Ban on Release Requests
BGE 131 III 457
Federal Supreme Court Clarifies Review Pathways for Release Requests During Compulsory Placement
Généré par l'IA
1C 16 32
Appeal Against Evidentiary Order Dismissed for Lack of Irreparable Disadvantage
V 06 236
Dismissal of Untimely Appeal Lacking Substance
2N 17 118
Father's Appeal of Battery Investigation Dismissal Rejected Due to Lack of Standing and Parental Consent
V 93 60
Appealability of Remand Order Lacking Current Legal Interest
22 01 15
Appeal Against Dismissal of Urgent Provisional Measures in Custody Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 397d Abs. 2 ZGB

Cited in the reasoning section as the legal basis allowing repeated appeals regarding release from compulsory treatment, which informs the context of the case's procedural history.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Familienrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 18.07.2005

Fallnummer: · 30 05 9

LGVE: · 2005 I Nr. 12

Leitsatz: · Art. 397d Abs. 2 ZGB. Die Einreichung von aufeinander folgenden Entlassungsgesuchen aus der fürsorgerischen Freiheitsentziehung (FFE) steht unter dem Vorbehalt des Handelns nach Treu und Glauben.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.