Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
22 04 137 • KG LU 22 04 137 Généré par l'IA

Hague Abduction Convention Time Limit Application

Numéro de cause 22 04 137
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The petitioner sought the return of children who had been brought to Switzerland by the respondent in late 2002, with the petitioner filing a return application in April 2004, which was dismissed as untimely by the lower court based on the one-year deadline under Article 12(1) of the Hague Abduction Convention. The appellate court upheld the dismissal, reasoning that the one-year deadline began to run from the date the petitioner clearly communicated his objection to the children remaining in Switzerland, evidenced by a January 2003 communication stating he was unhappy with the situation and requested confirmed return bookings by early March, and that subsequent negotiations for a friendly settlement did not pause or postpone the commencement of this statutory period, which was fixed to January 30, 2003.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 12 Abs. 1 HEntf, Art. 12 Abs. 1 HEnft, Art. 12 Abs. 1 HEntfÜ; Hague Abduction Convention Time Limit Application: The appellate court upheld the dismissal, reasoning that the one-year deadline began to run from the date the petitioner clearly communicated his objection to the children remaining in Switzerland, evidenced by a January 2003 communication stating he was unhappy with the situation and requested confirmed return bookings by early March, and that subsequent negotiations for a friendly settlement did not pause or postpone the commencement of this statutory period, which was fixed to January 30, 2003.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
retour selon la Convention de La Haye pourparlers transactionnels délai légal enlèvement d'enfant moment du dépôt délais de recours Art. 12 Abs. 1 HEntfÜ. Beginn der Jahresfrist. | Familienrecht

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 12 Abs. 1 HEntf
2 Leitsatz: · Art. 12 Abs. 1 HEntfÜ.
Art. 12 Abs. 1 HEnft
2 Leitsatz: · Art. 12 Abs.
Art. 12 Abs. 1 HEntfÜ
This article concerning the one-year time limit was central to the court's determination of the admissibility (timeliness) of the return request.
Généré par l'IA
22 02 4
Hague Abduction Convention Return Order Upheld Despite Appeal for Child Representative
V 98 127
Foreign National Child Family Reunification Age Assessment Timing
22 04 116
Hague Convention Return Denial Upheld Based on Children's Will
22 01 68
Hague Abduction Convention Enforcement Overrides Appeal in Cross-Border Child Removal Case
22 03 4
Child Abduction Appeal: Return to Italy Upheld; No Oral Hearing Required; Autonomous Interpretation of Habitual Residence Confirmed

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 12 Abs. 1 HEntfÜ

This article concerning the one-year time limit was central to the court's determination of the admissibility (timeliness) of the return request.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · II. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Familienrecht Entscheiddatum: · 17.12.2004 Fallnummer: · 22 04 137 LGVE: · 2004 I Nr. 2 Leitsatz: · Art. 12 Abs. 1 HEntfÜ. Beginn der Jahresfrist. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.