Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
22 03 12 • KG LU 22 03 12 Généré par l'IA

Appellate Court Ruling on Custody: Failure to Hear Children

Numéro de cause 22 03 12
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

In a dispute over child custody, the appellate court found that the lower court violated mandatory provisions of the relevant Civil Code articles and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child by failing to personally hear the children, who were of an age and maturity where such a hearing was appropriate, without providing sufficient justification. Despite this procedural violation constituting a denial of the right to be heard, the appellate court, exercising its full review capacity and prioritizing the need for prompt resolution in the best interest of the child, decided to rule on the merits itself rather than remanding the case for a rehearing.

Regeste Legislator

Officiel

Art. 144 Abs. 2 und 176 Abs. 3 ZGB; Art. 12 UNO-Übereinkommen über die Rechte des Kindes. Bei Obhutszuteilungsfragen sind die Kinder anzuhören, soweit nicht ihr Alter oder andere gewichtige Gründe dagegen sprechen. | Familienrecht

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
audition de l'enfant examen sur le fond droits de l'enfant violation de garanties procédurales retrait de l'autorité parentale contestation civile

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 12 UNO-Übereinkommen
3 ZGB; Art. 12 UNO-Übereinkommen über die Rechte des Kindes.
Art. 144 i.V.m
Leitsatz: · Art. 144 Abs.
Art. 176 ZGB
Art. 12 UNO-
3 ZGB; Art. 12 UNO-Übereinkommen über die Rechte des Kindes.
Art. 144 ZGB
Leitsatz: · Art. 144 Abs.
Art. 29 BV
Art. 144 Abs. 2 ZGB
This article, concerning the obligation to hear children in custody matters, was cited in the section of the decision setting out the grounds for the ruling.
Art. 176 Abs. 3 ZGB
This article, concerning the obligation to hear children in custody matters, was cited in the section of the decision setting out the grounds for the ruling.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
5P.112/2001
Constitutional Complaint in Matrimonial Protection Proceedings Regarding Custody and Visitation Rights
BGE 126 III 497
Father's Appeal: Failure to Hear Minor Children in Provisional Custody Decision
BGE 124 III 90
Parental Objection to Visitation Rights Based on Failure to Hear Child (Article 12 CRC)
5C.55/2002
Father's Appeal Against Non-Withdrawal of Custody Upheld Despite Concerns Over Mother's Conduct
5P.17/2003
Father v. Mother (Custody of Children)
5A.18/2001
Land Lease Registration Refusal Due to Violation of Right to be Heard
Généré par l'IA
22 09 50
Custody Dispute Involving Sibling Separation and Mandatory Child Hearing
3C 12 12
Suspension of Family Law Proceeding Without Hearing
30 04 9
Custody Appeal Procedural Violation Cured by Full Appellate Review
22 01 7
Custody Dispute: Denial of Guardian Upheld Due to Advanced Stage of Proceedings
OG 1996 2
Parental Visitation Agreement Approval in Appeal

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 144 Abs. 2 ZGB

This article, concerning the obligation to hear children in custody matters, was cited in the section of the decision setting out the grounds for the ruling.

Art. 176 Abs. 3 ZGB

This article, concerning the obligation to hear children in custody matters, was cited in the section of the decision setting out the grounds for the ruling.

Art. 12 UNO-Übereinkommen über die Rechte des Kindes

This article, concerning the right of the child to be heard, was cited in the section of the decision setting out the grounds for the ruling.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Familienrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 30.05.2003

Fallnummer: · 22 03 12

LGVE: · 2003 I Nr. 6

Leitsatz: · Art. 144 Abs. 2 und 176 Abs. 3 ZGB; Art. 12 UNO-Übereinkommen über die Rechte des Kindes. Bei Obhutszuteilungsfragen sind die Kinder anzuhören, soweit nicht ihr Alter oder andere gewichtige Gründe dagegen sprechen.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.