Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
21 08 123 • KG LU 21 08 123 Généré par l'IA

Dormicum Offenses: Quantitatively Severe Case Upheld

Numéro de cause 21 08 123
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellate court upheld the lower court's decision that the defendant's offenses involving the drug Dormicum constituted a quantitatively severe case under Article 19 Paragraph 2 lit. a of the Narcotics Act. The court reasoned that the threshold for a severe case, previously established by 1999 expert opinions based on the psychoactive substance Midazolam's potential for dependency and lethal mixed intoxications (set at 27 or 36 grams), remained valid despite the age of the reports, as the defendant provided no new scientific evidence to discredit them, and current knowledge confirms the significant dangers and risks associated with benzodiazepines like Midazolam, noting that the defendant significantly exceeded the threshold quantity of 2,400 tablets (36,000 mg).

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 19 Ziff. 2 lit. a BetmG, Art. 1 BetmG, Art. 19 Ziff. 1 BetmG; Dormicum Offenses: Quantitatively Severe Case Upheld: a of the Narcotics Act. The court reasoned that the threshold for a severe case, previously established by 1999 expert opinions based on the psychoactive substance Midazolam's potential for dependency and lethal mixed intoxications (set at 27 or 36 grams), remained valid despite the age of the reports, as the defendant provided no new scientific evidence to discredit them, and current knowledge confirms the significant dangers and risks associated with benzodiazepines like Midazolam, noting that the defendant significantly exceeded the threshold quantity of 2,400 tablets (36,000 mg).

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
infractions à la loi sur les stupéfiants dépendance aux substances cas moyennement grave nouveau moyen de preuve infractions contre la sécurité des rapports juridiques expertise judiciaire

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 19 Ziff. 2 lit. a BetmG
This article is cited as the basis for qualifying the offense as a quantitatively serious case (mengenmässig schwerer Fall) in the final decision.
Art. 1 BetmG
Leitsatz: · Art. 19 Ziff.
Art. 19 Ziff. 1 BetmG
The accused is held guilty of multiple violations of this article, committed as a serious case under Art. 19 Ziff. 2 lit. a BetmG.
Généré par l'IA
21 02 285
Appellate Court Decision on Provisional Criminal Confinement of Involuntarily Committed Individual
21 09 42
Challenge to Urgent Inpatient Psychiatric Order Based on Insufficient Medical Urgency
V 05 103 2
Expulsion Upheld Due to Severe Criminal Conviction Despite Long Residency
22 08 7
Ne Bis In Idem and Bodily Harm Charges Following Lesser Offense Penal Order

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 19 Ziff. 2 lit. a BetmG

This article is cited as the basis for qualifying the offense as a quantitatively serious case (mengenmässig schwerer Fall) in the final decision.

Art. 19 Ziff. 1 BetmG

The accused is held guilty of multiple violations of this article, committed as a serious case under Art. 19 Ziff. 2 lit. a BetmG.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 16.12.2008

Fallnummer: · 21 08 123

LGVE: · 2009 I Nr. 52

Leitsatz: · Art. 19 Ziff. 2 lit. a BetmG. Mengenmässig schwerer Fall nach Art. 19 Ziff. 2 lit. a BetmG mit dem Medikament Dormicum.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.