Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
21 07 78 • KG LU 21 07 78 Généré par l'IA

Jurisdiction for Revocation of Conditional Release Under New Penal Code

Numéro de cause 21 07 78
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An individual conditionally released in December 2004 was subsequently convicted in April 2007 for offenses committed partly during the probation period, leading the correctional services to inquire which authority had jurisdiction to decide on a potential revocation of the conditional release under the newly enacted penal code provisions. The court reasoned that since the new law's provisions regarding the regime of execution of sentences apply even to those convicted under the old law, and drawing an analogy from jurisprudence regarding conditional release (Art. 86 StGB), the court that judged the new offenses (the Appellate Court) retains jurisdiction under the new law (Art. 89 Abs. 1 StGB) to decide on any subsequent revocation of the earlier conditional release.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 89 Abs. 1 StGB, Art. 63 StGB, Art. 38 Ziff. 4 Abs. 1 aStGB, Art. 388 Abs. 3 StGB, Art. 89 StGB, Art. 86 StGB; Jurisdiction for Revocation of Conditional Release Under New Penal Code: The court reasoned that since the new law's provisions regarding the regime of execution of sentences apply even to those convicted under the old law, and drawing an analogy from jurisprudence regarding conditional release (Art. 86 StGB), the court that judged the new offenses (the Appellate Court) retains jurisdiction under the new law (Art. 89 Abs. 1 StGB) to decide on any subsequent revocation of the earlier conditional release.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
révocation de la libération conditionnelle fixation de la peine code de procédure pénale remise de détenus peines avec sursis libération de l'obligation de travailler

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 89 Abs. 1 StGB
This article determines the competent authority (Obergericht) for deciding on the recommitment to prison following new criminal activity.
Art. 63 StGB
Art. 38 Ziff. 4 Abs. 1 aStGB
Art. 388 Abs. 3 StGB
Art. 89 StGB
Leitsatz: · Art. 89 Abs.
Art. 86 StGB

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
BGE 133 IV 201
Conditional Early Release and Application of New Drug Sentencing Laws
Généré par l'IA
V 98 157
Discretionary Revocation of Conditional Release Lacking Prognosis and Consideration of Positive Post-Offense Changes
4N 21 2
Interpretation of Penal Code Article 63b Para 4 Sentence 2 Regarding Conditional Sentence Execution After Outpatient Measures
4H 19 44
Military, Civil Protection, and Penitentiary Service Authority for Conditional Release Decisions
21 06 190
Retroactive Application of Milder Criminal Code Provisions in Sentencing
21 97 176
Deferred Sentence Conditional Suspension Limits

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 89 Abs. 1 StGB

This article determines the competent authority (Obergericht) for deciding on the recommitment to prison following new criminal activity.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · II. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Strafrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 26.07.2007

Fallnummer: · 21 07 78

LGVE: · 2007 I Nr. 46

Leitsatz: · Art. 89 Abs. 1 StGB. Sachliche Zuständigkeit für die Rückversetzung in den Strafvollzug nach erneuter Straffälligkeit.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.