Hotel Eviction Appeal: Factual Disputes Preclude Summary Relief

The court considered an appeal against a summary eviction order concerning the use of a hotel, where the applicant (a corporation) claimed the respondent was not entitled to possession either through a disputed share purchase agreement or a tenancy. The appellate court overturned the lower court's decision, reasoning that summary proceedings under the relevant procedural article require an undisputed or immediately provable factual situation and a clear legal position; because the applicant presented highly contradictory statements regarding the existence, validity, and rescission of the alleged stock purchase agreement in its submissions and accompanying documents, it failed to establish the necessary clear and coherent factual basis required for summary relief, thus necessitating a full proceeding.