Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
11 10 55 • KG LU 11 10 55 Généré par l'IA

Boathouse Addition Ownership Dispute

Numéro de cause 11 10 55
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge de l'autorité
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The case concerned the ownership of an addition to a boathouse originally built in 1932 by the defendant's predecessor on the plaintiff's boathouse, following a limited-term agreement that was later terminated. The court affirmed the lower court's decision, reasoning that the plaintiff, as the established owner of the original boathouse, was inherently the owner of the addition under the mandatory provisions of Article 642 of the Civil Code, which dictates that an addition inseparable from the main structure becomes its component part, overriding any contractual stipulations between the parties regarding separate ownership of that component.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 642 ZGB, Art. 642 Abs. 1 ZGB, Art. 642 Abs. 2 ZGB, Art. 19 Abs. 2 OR; Boathouse Addition Ownership Dispute: The court affirmed the lower court's decision, reasoning that the plaintiff, as the established owner of the original boathouse, was inherently the owner of the addition under the mandatory provisions of Article 642 of the Civil Code, which dictates that an addition inseparable from the main structure becomes its component part, overriding any contractual stipulations between the parties regarding separate ownership of that component.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
contestation civile copropriété responsabilité pour dégâts d'eau loi d'application immédiate propriété mobilière réunion aux acquêts

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 642 ZGB
This provision was the basis for determining that the plaintiff was the owner of the boathouse extension because it qualified as a component part.
Art. 642 Abs. 1 ZGB
9 Leitsatz: · Art. 642 ZGB.
Art. 642 Abs. 2 ZGB
9 Leitsatz: · Art. 642 ZGB.
Art. 19 Abs. 2 OR
Généré par l'IA
11 06 129
Servitude Deletion and Obsolete Usefulness of Boat House Right
RRE Nr 1462
Lakeside Owners v. Administrative Body (Public Water Use Permit Denial)
1B 14 53
Co-Owners' Access Dispute to Neighboring Roof Terrace Over Water Damage Repair
7H 19 266
Insurance Denial Appeal Affirmed: Boathouse Damage Not Proven Storm Surge Cause

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 642 ZGB

This provision was the basis for determining that the plaintiff was the owner of the boathouse extension because it qualified as a component part.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · I. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Sachenrecht Entscheiddatum: · 28.10.2010 Fallnummer: · 11 10 55 LGVE: · 2011 I Nr. 9 Leitsatz: · Art. 642 ZGB. Eigentumsverhältnisse an einem Bootshaus und dessen Anbau. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.