Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
11 09 127 • KG LU 11 09 127 Généré par l'IA

Foundation Council Member Fiduciary Duty Claim Dismissed Over High-Risk Investment

Numéro de cause 11 09 127
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellate court upheld the dismissal of a claim against a foundation council member for alleged breach of fiduciary duty due to a high-risk investment strategy implemented after the founder's death, governed by Liechtenstein law. The court reasoned that the plaintiff failed to sufficiently substantiate that the holding of specific stocks, which constituted 55-60% of the portfolio, constituted an unacceptable risk profile requiring immediate sale by the specific date alleged; while the asset allocation did not perfectly align with a "slightly growth-oriented" strategy, the plaintiff did not provide evidence on the specific risk character of the Nasdaq-listed stocks or demonstrate that holding them further, especially when the market showed slight recovery signs and external advice favored holding, amounted to negligence that a conscientious council member would have avoided.

Regeste Legislator

Officiel

Liechtensteinische Familienstiftung, Sorgfaltspflichtverletzung eines Stiftungsrats durch hochriskante Anlagestrategie verneint. | Zivilrecht

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
fiduciaire fondation de placement manquement au devoir recouvrement d'actifs responsabilité de l'institution de prévoyance licenciement avec effet immédiat

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 932a PGR
Art. 913 PGR
Art. 913 Abs. 4 PGR
Art. 182 Abs. 1 PGR
Art. 245 Abs. 1 PGR
Art. 51 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG
Provision used to determine the value in dispute for the case.
Art. 99 BGG
Art. 119 Abs. 1 ZPO
Provision under which the appellant was ordered to bear the procedural costs of both instances because the appeal was unfounded.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
BGE 134 I 88
BGE 124 III 99
Généré par l'IA
S 03 401
Foundation Dismissed as Improper Defendant in Vested Benefits Dispute
OG 1994 5
Universal Heir's Claim to Pension Funds Rejected in Favor of Statutory Heirs
A 09 16
Tax Authority's Right to Secure Claims Against Pension Distribution
S 05 144
Pension Fund Overpayment Recovery Time-Barred
A 10 201
Pension Institution Property Tax Exemption Dispute

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 119 Abs. 1 ZPO

Provision under which the appellant was ordered to bear the procedural costs of both instances because the appeal was unfounded.

§ 57 i.V.m. § 55 Abs. 1 KoV

Basis for the fixation of the respondent's legal fees for the appellate procedure.

§ 65 Abs. 1 KoV

Provision used to determine the amount of the respondent's legal fees for the appellate procedure.

Art. 51 Abs. 1 lit. a BGG

Provision used to determine the value in dispute for the case.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 26.04.2010

Fallnummer: · 11 09 127

LGVE:

Leitsatz: · Liechtensteinische Familienstiftung, Sorgfaltspflichtverletzung eines Stiftungsrats durch hochriskante Anlagestrategie verneint.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.