Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
11 08 155 • KG LU 11 08 155 Généré par l'IA

Pre-emptive Right Enforcement: Security for Costs Requirement Upheld

Numéro de cause 11 08 155
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

In a dispute concerning the enforcement of a statutory pre-emptive right over a farm, the court upheld the lower court's decision requiring the claimant to provide security for costs amounting to CHF 45,000 due to his apparent lack of assets. The court reasoned that the proffered surety, offered under a specific article of the Code of Obligations, did not qualify as a valid form of security under the relevant procedural law, as it was conditional and did not offer the immediate satisfaction guaranteed by the statutorily enumerated forms of security like cash, securities, or bank guarantees. Furthermore, the court affirmed the initial calculation of the dispute value, which determined the required security amount, based on the higher monetary interest asserted by the defendants in maintaining the agreed sale price over the claimant's interest in acquiring the property at its capitalized earning value.

Regeste Legislator

Officiel

§§ 18 Abs. 1 und 127 Abs. 1 ZPO; § 3 Abs. 2 KoV. Die Schadlosbürgschaft gemäss Art. 495 Abs. 3 OR fällt nicht unter die Sicherstellungsarten gemäss § 127 Abs. 1 ZPO. Streitwert bei Klage auf Anerkennung und Durchsetzung eines Vorkaufsrechts bezüglich eines landwirtschaftlichen Gewerbes. | Zivilprozessrecht

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
constitution de sûretés frais d'exécution valeur litigieuse garanties procédurales droit à la propriété droit des obligations

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 495 Abs. 3 OR
Die Schadlosbürgschaft gemäss Art. 495 Abs. 3 OR fällt nicht unter die Sicherstellungsarten gemäss § 127 Abs.
Art. 44 BGBB
§ 127 Abs. 1 ZPO
The court confirmed that the offered indemnity bond does not meet the security types specified in this provision.
§ 18 Abs. 1 ZPO
This provision was used to determine that the value in dispute corresponds to the plaintiff's request, specifically the purchase price.
§ 3 Abs. 2 KoV
This provision was applied to set the value in dispute at the higher amount (the sale price) because the parties' interests were unequal.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
BGE 109 II 245
Pre-emption Right in Land Sale Circumventing Rural Land Law and Abuse of Forfeiture Defense
BGE 109 II 248
Généré par l'IA
01 06 9
Security for Litigation Costs Granted Due to Defendant's Apparent Insolvency
OG 1995 31
Creditor Enforcement Actions as Basis for Security for Costs
OG 1991 33
Security for Costs in Foreign Judgment Recognition Proceedings
01 10 8
Security for Costs Exemption Appeal Regarding Retention Inventory
SK 03 69
Appellant's Right to Enforce Awarded Costs Despite Alleged Assignment

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
§ 127 Abs. 1 ZPO

The court confirmed that the offered indemnity bond does not meet the security types specified in this provision.

§ 18 Abs. 1 ZPO

This provision was used to determine that the value in dispute corresponds to the plaintiff's request, specifically the purchase price.

§ 3 Abs. 2 KoV

This provision was applied to set the value in dispute at the higher amount (the sale price) because the parties' interests were unequal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht

Abteilung: · I. Kammer

Rechtsgebiet: · Zivilprozessrecht

Entscheiddatum: · 16.02.2009

Fallnummer: · 11 08 155

LGVE: · 2009 I Nr. 21

Leitsatz: · §§ 18 Abs. 1 und 127 Abs. 1 ZPO; § 3 Abs. 2 KoV. Die Schadlosbürgschaft gemäss Art. 495 Abs. 3 OR fällt nicht unter die Sicherstellungsarten gemäss § 127 Abs. 1 ZPO. Streitwert bei Klage auf Anerkennung und Durchsetzung eines Vorkaufsrechts bezüglich eines landwirtschaftlichen Gewerbes.

Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.