Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
11 08 101 2 • KG LU 11 08 101 2 Généré par l'IA

Lease Termination Validity After Discontinued Criminal Proceedings

Numéro de cause 11 08 101 2
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court addressed an appeal concerning the validity of an extraordinary termination of two lease agreements for a restaurant and associated rooms, initially based on allegations of criminal acts by the lessee's representative. The initial termination cited criminal acts against the lessor, which the lessor later substantiated by referencing an ongoing criminal complaint regarding property offenses related to building renovations; however, that criminal case was ultimately discontinued. The court reasoned that under applicable law, the grounds for an extraordinary termination must exist at the time the notice is given, and while the lessor initially specified criminal acts forming the basis of the now-discontinued prosecution, the lessor attempted to introduce entirely new grounds (alleged malicious persecution and defamation) that occurred after the termination date, which constituted an impermissible post-hoc supplementation of the termination reasons, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and affirming the lower court's finding that the leases remained in effect.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 266g Abs. 1 OR, Art. 266g OR, BGE 92 II 189 E. 4e, § 252 Abs. 1 ZPO; Lease Termination Validity After Discontinued Criminal Proceedings: The initial termination cited criminal acts against the lessor, which the lessor later substantiated by referencing an ongoing criminal complaint regarding property offenses related to building renovations; however, that criminal case was ultimately discontinued. The court reasoned that under applicable law, the grounds for an extraordinary termination must exist at the time the notice is given, and while the lessor initially specified criminal acts forming the basis of the now-discontinued prosecution, the lessor attempted to introduce entirely new grounds (alleged malicious persecution and defamation) that occurred after the termination date, which constituted an impermissible post-hoc supplementation of the termination reasons, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and affirming the lower court's finding that the leases remained in effect.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
validité de la résiliation de bail chose louée dénonciation pénale résiliation immédiate procédure pour diffamation procédure d'expulsion

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 266g Abs. 1 OR
The appeal was dismissed because the grounds for termination cited later were an inadmissible extension of the originally stated grounds.
Art. 266g OR
Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht) Entscheiddatum: · 13.05.2009 Fallnummer: · 11 08 101.2 LGVE: Leitsatz: · Art. 266g Abs.
BGE 92 II 189 E. 4e
Cited to support the principle that termination is only effective if important reasons objectively exist at the time of termination.
§ 252 Abs. 1 ZPO
Used to deem the appellant's late submission of new facts inadmissible.

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
BGE 92 II 189
Généré par l'IA
11 08 87
Hotel Lease Termination Validity Dispute
1B 18 38
Commercial Lease Termination Validity and Extension Due to Landlord's Business Need
11 08 101 1
Landlord Lease Termination: Grounds Must Exist at Notice Date
11 07 72
Validity of Rent Arrears Notice and Lease Termination
11 05 50
Appeal Concerning Suspension of Tenancy Eviction Proceedings

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 266g Abs. 1 OR

The appeal was dismissed because the grounds for termination cited later were an inadmissible extension of the originally stated grounds.

BGE 92 II 189 E. 4e

Cited to support the principle that termination is only effective if important reasons objectively exist at the time of termination.

§ 252 Abs. 1 ZPO

Used to deem the appellant's late submission of new facts inadmissible.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · I. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · OR (Obligationenrecht) Entscheiddatum: · 13.05.2009 Fallnummer: · 11 08 101.2 LGVE: Leitsatz: · Art. 266g Abs. 1 OR. Ausserordentliche Kündigung. Unzulässiges Nachschieben von Kündigungsgründen. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.