Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
11 06 129 • KG LU 11 06 129 Généré par l'IA

Servitude Deletion and Obsolete Usefulness of Boat House Right

Numéro de cause 11 06 129
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction Suisse · Canton de Lucerne (CH-LU)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant
Ouvrir la source officielle Miroir Entscheidsuche Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellate court reviewed the lower court's decision to reinstate a boat house usage right (a servitude) that had been deleted by the land registry office under the provision allowing deletion of obsolete servitudes (Art. 976 ZGB). The deletion was challenged by the owner of the dominant tenement, arguing that the servitude had not become obviously and incontrovertibly useless, despite claims by the burdened property owners that neglect of maintenance and a change in the dominant property's size indicated a loss of interest. The court reasoned that under Art. 736 Abs. 1 ZGB, deletion requires the dominant owner to have definitively lost all interest, and a lack of maintenance is only an indication, not proof of total loss of interest; furthermore, the original purpose, evidenced in the deed, was not strictly tied to residential use of the dominant property, meaning the servitude remained valid and could not be deleted administratively.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Art. 976 ZGB, Art. 970 ZGB, Art. 736 Abs. 1 ZGB, Art. 91 Abs. 3 GBV, Art. 976 Abs. 3 ZGB, Art. 90 ff. des Bundesgerichtsgesetzes (BGG; Servitude Deletion and Obsolete Usefulness of Boat House Right: 976 ZGB). The deletion was challenged by the owner of the dominant tenement, arguing that the servitude had not become obviously and incontrovertibly useless, despite claims by the burdened property owners that neglect of maintenance and a change in the dominant property's size indicated a loss of interest. The court reasoned that under Art. 736 Abs. 1 ZGB, deletion requires the dominant owner to have definitively lost all interest, and a lack of maintenance is only an indication, not proof of total loss of interest; furthermore, the original purpose, evidenced in the deed, was not strictly tied to residential use of the dominant property, meaning the servitude remained valid and could not be deleted administratively.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
droit à la propriété affectation résidentielle changement d'affectation fonds dominant détournement d'objets sous main de justice droit de reprise de la possession Art. 736 Abs. 1 und 976 ZGB. Löschung einer Dienstbarkeit. | Sachenrecht

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
Art. 976 ZGB
The court determined that the prior deletion of the servitude based on this article was wrongful, leading to the order for re-entry.
Art. 970 ZGB
Art. 736 Abs. 1 ZGB
The court examined the conditions for the deletion of the servitude under this article to confirm the deletion was not justified.
Art. 91 Abs. 3 GBV
Art. 976 Abs. 3 ZGB
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the unlimited action for correction of the land register, supporting the claimant's right to seek re-entry.
Art. 90 ff. des Bundesgerichtsgesetzes (BGG
Art. 72 ff. des Bundesgerichtsgesetzes (BGG

Jurisprudence citée

Généré par l'IA
BGE 91 II 194
BGE 107 II 334
BGE 107 II 335
Généré par l'IA
JK 98 131
Servitude Deletion Requires Civil Action Due to Contentious Facts
1I 13 49
Deletion of Erroneous Right-of-Way Servitude
11 10 55
Boathouse Addition Ownership Dispute
JK 09 20
Appeal Regarding Deletion of Residential Right and Registration of Tenancy Agreement
JK
Property Right Deletion Challenge Procedure

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
Art. 976 ZGB

The court determined that the prior deletion of the servitude based on this article was wrongful, leading to the order for re-entry.

Art. 736 Abs. 1 ZGB

The court examined the conditions for the deletion of the servitude under this article to confirm the deletion was not justified.

Art. 976 Abs. 3 ZGB

Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the unlimited action for correction of the land register, supporting the claimant's right to seek re-entry.

Art. 90 ff. des Bundesgerichtsgesetzes (BGG)

Cited regarding the admissibility of an appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.

Art. 72 ff. des Bundesgerichtsgesetzes (BGG)

Cited regarding the admissibility of an appeal in civil matters to the Federal Supreme Court.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

Rechtsprechung Luzern

Instanz: · Obergericht Abteilung: · I. Kammer Rechtsgebiet: · Sachenrecht Entscheiddatum: · 14.09.2007 Fallnummer: · 11 06 129 LGVE: Leitsatz: · Art. 736 Abs. 1 und 976 ZGB. Löschung einer Dienstbarkeit. Rechtskraft: · Diese Entscheidung ist rechtskräftig.